The Sheriff of the San Bernardino Police Department has said: ‘It [the video] is disturbing and it appears on its face that there are violations of policy, but that will ultimately be determined in the investigation and to what degree’.*

The video, it should be said, is disturbing absolutelywithout qualification. As one human being treating another, it is unacceptable. Is this not the fundamental problem: that the citing of such rationalizations as always a possible recourse creates and engenders these situations of abuse (to which such rationalizations will always be invoked)? And not vice versa.

More than a determined disappointment concerning the Eric Garner ruling, the very possibility, the very grounds of such a defense as Pantaleo (and by extension, the NYPD) gave, shows itself as unethical.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s